UA-53087017-1
Tags Posts tagged with "tablet comparison"

tablet comparison

by -
0 585

Tablet is the choice of all business personnel as they need to make presentation or create project report etc. Keeping this necessity in mind both Micromax and Samsung has launched tablet PC for all, Micromax Funbook Ultra HD P580 and Samsung Tab 3 Lite. The tablets are designed so well that will replace the need of laptop to certain extent. We will go through all the details of the features and specs of both the tablet.

Samsung Tab Galaxy 3 Lite vs Micromax Funbook Ultra HD P580

Display and Camera:

Samsung and Micromax have display of 7 and 7.8-inch with resolution 1280×600 and 1280×720 respectively. Samsung has used simple LCD technology for display while Micromax has IPS LCD technology used in its device. Samsung tablet has good display but compare to IPS LCD of Micromax it lacks behind. Micromax has good contrast ratio and fine outdoor visibility while Samsung lacks in both the features.

Camera of 5MP is placed at rear of Micromax tablet and 2MP at front. Making video call or capturing image will not be an issue with Micromax tablet. Samsung has only rear camera that too of 2MP which shoots video at VGA resolution.

Hardware and Battery:

Tablet will perform only when the heart of the tablet is strong, if we talk about the heart in Micromax and Samsung; it is very strong and is capable to perform well in severe conditions. Micromax has heart of 1.2GHz Quad-core processor with 1GB RAM  with quad engine processor multiprocessing will be just a matter of time and 1GB RAM will take care of multitasking. Samsung has 1.2GHz Dual-Core processor and 1GB RAM configuration on Samsung is less than Micromax but has potential to handle the multitasking and multiprocessing task with ease. Samsung and Micromax tablet has 8GB internal memory and are further expandable.

Battery should be powerful in such tablets as we saw the power hidden under these tablets and to serve this tablet we need some powerful backup. Battery in both the tablets is very powerful, Battery in Micromax and Samsung is same ie. 3600mAh. Charge once and you are able to work with your tablet for long hours. Both the tablets provide good standby time and supports to play games and browsing for more than 10 hours.

Software:

Micromax tablet will make use of Android Jelly bean 4.2.2 and same UI which is found in all Micromax Tablet. Samsung is also run on same OS of Android 4.2.2 but UI of Samsung is TouchWiz.

Conclusion:

If we observe both the tablet then we come to know that most of the features and specs of hardware provided in both are same. In other terms both will be a tough competitor in the market as Samsung has introduced its lite version tablet and Micromax has introduced good specs tablet. Price of Samsung is little higher than Micromax which can turn users to choose Micromax. Micromax has a better processor than Samsung and good display than Samsung. Battery and onboard storage of both the device are same. Micromax is not known as reliable performer and this is only drawback to conclude, rest all is better and more powerful than Samsung’s Tablet.

by -
0 704

History repeats itself and so the world is moving from small phones to bigger device now. Mobile size was quite big when it was launched in 90’s and then the size went on decreasing and reached to its extreme and now again from 2 inch of display world has migrated to 10 inch tablet PC.

Micromax and Samsung have announced its latest tablet device named Micromax Canvas Tab P650E and Samsung Tab 3 lite. Both the companies are moving fast in competition and have covered market in all segment, however Micromax is not considered as status phone but still provides very good features in their devices. Samsung is common name taken by people all over globe because Samsung is now penetrated deep in all the segment of mobile phones.

Micromax Canvas Tab P650E vs Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 Lite

Display:

Micromax Canvas Tab has 7 inch of display and is the first phone to have CDMA support in tablet segment. Big display will help you to do official presentation effectively. Samsung Tab 3 lite has 7-inch display with resolution of 600×1024 pixels and has good LCD display output.

Hardware:

Micromax Canvas tab is been set up with 1.2GHz Quad-core processor and 512MB RAM, so big display and good processing set-up will never let you down. If you are in to gaming or heavy browser then multitasking and multi-processing feature of the phone is just perfect for you. Samsung Tab 3 will have 1.2 dual-core processor and 1GB RAM which will take care of all computing process. Micromax has 4GB inbuilt storage which can be further extended with the help of microSD card. While in Samsung 8GB storage and further expandable too. Samsung has hardware less powerful than Micromax Canvas but price of Samsung tab is more than Micromax.

OS:

Micromax Canvas Tab will run on Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, whereas Samsung Tab will run on 4.2.2 Jelly Bean and has its own UI of TouchWiz. User interface of Micromax is simple and common in all Micromax Canvas tablet.

Camera:

Samsung Tab 3 Lite is been specified with 2MP camera at back which shoots video at VGA resolution. Front camera is absent in Samsung Tab. Micromax has both front and rear camera, front camera is of 0.3MP resolution and rear has 2MP camera.

Battery:

3000 mAh battery of Micromax Canvas Tab is sufficient to handle its hardware configuration and will last for more than 10 hours. Samsung will make use of 3600 mAh battery to operate its resources like hardware and will serve you with backup of more than 12 hours.

Conclusion:

Samsung and Micromax are providing very good configuration, you can see that configuration of Micromax is little fizzy as tablet is provided with Quad-core processor but RAM is just 512mb. RAM of the tablet should have been at least 1GB to handle Quad-core processor. Display is weak; it should have been brighter and more vibrant. Samsung has good configuration as the name suggest it is a Lite version so configuration is well balanced in this tablet. Display resolution is low it should have been more pixel dense.