Tags Posts tagged with "phone compare"

phone compare

by -
0 756

The eternal Note series of Smartphone’s by Samsung dates back to 2011 when the first Note came into existence with a bigger display than ever giving a great sales count to Samsung along with the fame. The same adrenaline rush is experienced even these days when we get hold of a monstrous Note 4 Smartphone, being the most premium Smartphone ever by Samsung. Finally looks like some competitive phase has started for the Galaxy Note 4 with the unveiling of highly configured Smartphone Xiaomi Mi Note Pro by the Chinese manufacturer Xiaomi who has been making headlines since last year and has given push to 2015 with this gigantic Xiaomi Mi Note Pro Smartphone highly competitive for most of the top class Smartphone’s in the premium range. So, here today we have fixed up a full on comparison analysis between these Smartphone’s to get the perfect one out of these. The competition looks a bit unbalanced bit trust Phone Lane, our vision says Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has got the spark to stand against Galaxy Note 4. So, let’s head straight towards the arena.

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Vs Xiaomi Mi Note Pro

1. Build Quality and Display: Fatefully, both these Smartphone’s are endowed with howling 5.7 inches display with similar resolution of 1440*2560 pixels and pixel density of 515 ppi. The only difference lies in the fact that Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has got IPS LCD display and Galaxy Note 4 has got super AMOLED display, but at the end of the day, quality as well as quantity is similar that is what matters. However unlike Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, Galaxy Note 4 features Corning Gorilla Glass 4, where as Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is sheltered with Corning Gorilla Glass 3. In case of build quality, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro incorporates Corning Gorilla Glass 3 back panel where as Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comes with leathery back and both these Smartphone’s are surrounded by metallic rim. Thus overall, both the Smartphone’s are greatly engineered according to different conceptions providing a flawless zeal and zest.

2. Performance: The performance of a Smartphone depends upon its internal architecture whether and the OS. So, let’s take a keen observation of those chipsets. Galaxy Note 4 comes pre-installed with Android v 4.4.4 Kit Kat upgradable to v 5.0 Lollipop as soon as it’s made available. It operates on a Quad core Snapdragon 805 processor clocked at 2.7 GHz accompanied by 3GB RAM and Adreno 420 GPU at its best. On the other hand, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro will be shipping with Android v5.0.1 Lollipop OS operating on a Quad core Snapdragon 810 processor clocked at 1.5 GHz accompanied by 4 GB RAM and Adreno 430 GPU. Thus, it’s clear that Xiaomi Mi Note Pro as well as Galaxy Note 4 has got good stuff inside however an extra gigabyte of RAM in case of Xiaomi Mi Note Pro will make it a bit more beastly in installation and working of different applications, also GPU of this Smartphone is better upgraded than Galaxy Note 4. However a big more clocking speed is seen in highest variant of Galaxy Note 4 which is in the game. It wouldn’t make much difference though.

3. Camera Clarity: Intermixed observations are being seen in this scenario with both Smartphone’s at their best. Xiaomi Mi Note Pro flaunting a 13 MP rear camera and 4 MP front shooter, while as Galaxy Note 4 houses 16 MP rear camera and 3.7 MP front shooter. The situation being twisted but clear though, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has got few less megapixels as compared to Galaxy Note 4 but in case of front shooter Galaxy Note 4 has got lesser megapixels making it bit lesser choice for selfie revolution. If you want both the cameras to do well, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is there however if rear camera matters for you more than anything, Galaxy Note 4 is for you.

4. Storage: Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is present with 64 GB onboard storage without SD card compatibility, where as Galaxy Note 4 has got 32 GB internal storage and expandability up to 128 GB. Although 64 GB is enough storage for a Smartphone to be ideal but Galaxy Note 4 with it’s expanding option can store more. The choice here depends up on the storage needs of a buyer.

5. Battery Endurance: Being crammed with a 3220 mAh Li-ion battery, Galaxy Note 4 has got the endurance to provide 20 hours on 3G, while as Xiaomi Mi Note Pro with 3090 mAh Li-Po battery is also expected to provide good back up, however, exact values are not evaluated for Xiaomi Mi Note Pro yet. Observations suggest Galaxy Note 4 will be giving a few more hours of freedom than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro.

After going through all the stuff engulfed by these beasts, the competition reveals that both have got the upper hand in display and build quality, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro with extra gigabyte and upgraded GPU as well as chipset has upper hand over Galaxy Note 4, rear camera is a bit improved in Galaxy Note 4 and battery is awesome in Galaxy Note 4 but good in Xiaomi Mi Note Pro. We must not neglect the price we are paying for these Smartphone, as Galaxy Note 4 couldn’t totally over power Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, thus it still resides in the game. You have got freedom to spend bundles on Galaxy Note 4 or enjoy lookalike features at much lower pricing. Since both the Smartphone have got almost same features, price conscious buyers wanting best experience will prefer Xiaomi Mi Note Pro however people who don’t care about pricing can go for Galaxy Note 4.

by -
0 765

Motorola Nexus 6 as well as iPhone 6 Plus are the two latest flagships from Google and Apple respectively. Both these tech firms have reached the peaks of advancement and are producing some real top class highend Smartphone’s for people of this generation. However Apple is being doing since a long time and Google has also stepped in it. Both these Smartphone models are the extremities of luxury both the operating systems can provide. Whether it’s Android OS or iOS, the best of both is seen in these Smartphone’s and also the best of these two Smartphone developers is encased in the configuration of these Smartphone’s. So, here we will provide the complete architecture of these Smartphone’s and check out which one has got the best material incorporated in its genes. You can consider this as your genetics class of these Smartphone’s.

Motorola Nexus 6 Vs Apple iPhone 6 Plus

1. Build Quality and Design: Nexus 6 casing has been designed of contoured Aluminium. However all the other older variants were poly carbonate derivatives and this is the big change from Motorola considering the look and durability of the Smartphone. As compared to its size, its weight has also been balanced and doesn’t feel like a bulk when handled. iPhone 6 Plus has also been designed in keeping the view, it’s easy handling and maintaining its curvy edges. The metalized case has been kept 7.1 mm thick only to allow users to handle this Smartphone with ease. The main concept is to give the light weight metallic look in their Smartphone’s. Apple is being doing it since ages and it was a new experience for Motorola and need to be explored.

2. Display Configuration: Motorola Nexus 6 flaunts a 5.96 inches AMOLED display providing resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and pixel density of 493 ppi. However iPhone 6 Plus houses a 5.5 inches LED backlit IPS LCD display providing screen resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and pixel density of 401ppi. Looking at the numeric data here it’s clearly evident that Nexus 6 has got 0.46 inches extra big display as compared to iPhone 6 Plus and has got moderately higher pixel density. So, Nexus 6 will be providing much highly exceptional display clarity but iPhone 6 Plus has got a good resolution also it cannot be neglected.

3. Camera Quality: This factor is the most investigated factor seen nowadays and plays a crucial part in overall performance of a Smartphone. Nexus 6 is implanted with a 13 MP primary camera taking snaps with resolution of 4128 x 3096 pixels while as iPhone 6 Plus has got an 8 MP primary camera with picture resolution of 3264 x 2448 pixels. Both the Smartphone’s have got good variety of additional camera features. For video calling and selfie Motorola Nexus 6 has got 2MP front shooter but iPhone 6 plus is seen with just 1.2MP front shooter. In this section also Nexus 6 has got better camera quality than the iPhone 6 Plus. However the main motive behind the limited camera pixels of Apple is known best by them. They are the real giants indeed. Or the 8MP camera is found sufficient by Apple for having in your Smartphone with some nicely trimmed features.

4. Performance: Nexus 6 is pre-installed with latest version of Android OS v 5.0 Lollipop and Apple iPhone 6 plus comes with iOS 8 upgradeable to the latest v 8.0.2. Nexus 6 runs on a Quad core Snapdragon 805 processor clocked at 2.7 GHz and Apple iPhone 6 plus houses a dual core Apple A8 chipset clocked at 1.4 GHz. The Nexus 6 application running efficiency is very vast with its 3 GB of RAM and its efficiency and speed can be judged by its super fast processor. However, 1 GB RAM is present in iPhone6 Plus which makes it run quite fast, efficient and smoother. This is the case of stability of an operating system and iOs is obviously more stable than android consuming less RAM and hence Apple provides their Smartphone with required amount of RAM.

5. Network and Connectivity: In this case both the Smartphone are top class compatible with 2G, 3G and 4G networks. And network connectivity modes including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and NFC. So this case is a tie with both the Smartphone’s possessing identical capabilities.

6. Storage capacity: Nexus 6 comes in 32 GB and 64 GB storage variants while as iPhone 6 plus comes in 16 GB, 64 GB and 128 GB storage variants. Both the Smartphone’s are devoid of storage expandability via SD card. So, it’s up to your need to choose the perfect storage variant for you.

7. Battery Backup: Nexus 6 is packed with a non removable 3220 mAh battery providing 24 hours of 2G talk time while as iPhone 6 Plus houses a non removable 2915 mAh Li-Po battery also providing 24 hours on 2G. So here both the Smartphone’s are equally stable on their provided batteries and will expectedly provide a good day of usage.

Taking overall look at these Smartphone’s, it’s clearly seen that Nexus 6 is housing a high configuration display, camera and processor but the fact still remains that we are talking about the Smartphone’s of two highly different operating systems and

their need of configuration also differs when it comes to processors and storage needed. So, iPhone 6 Plus can’t be judged inferior here only because it’s OS is more stable.

by -
0 1904

Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen. is an upgrade to the world famous Moto G which did maximum sales for Motorola last year. The basic model design remains the same however there’s an upgrade in its configuration. Released recently in September 2014 however release of sony Xperia E3 is expected later in this month of September. Sony Xperia E3 is the latest variant of E range of their Smartphone’s and is expected to be highly upgraded. Here we want to have an epic battle between these Smartphone’s both being the latest flagships from both ends. So, let’s start the comparison and see which one is the best buy Smartphone among these two.

Motorola Moto G 2014 vs Sony Xperia E3

Motorola Moto G 2014 vs. Sony Xperia E3

1. Display Configuration: Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen. houses a 5.0inches IPS LCD providing resolution of 720*1280pixels and pixel density of 294ppi. Xperia E3 flaunts a 4.5inches display providing resolution of 480*854pixels and pixel density of 218ppi. In this case Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen. has got better display size as well as display quality as compared to Sony Xperia E3.

2. Camera Quality: A 8MP primary camera with LED flash and 2MP front camera is present in Moto G 2nd Gen. however Xperia E3 is provided with 5Mp primary camera with LED flash and VGA front shooter. Here also Moto G 2nd Gen. is the best among the two. Surprisingly Sony Xperia E3 has showcased very ordinary camera configuration which to been seen in this Smartphone is astonishing.

3. Performance: Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen. comes preinstalled with Android v4.4.4 Kit Kat upgradable to Android L and operates on Quad core Snapdragon 400 processor clocked at 1.2GHz. Xperia E3 installed with Android v4.4.2 Kit Kat operates on same quad core Snapdragon 400 processor clocked at 1.2GHz. Both the Smartphone’s are coupled with 1GB RAM; this is good for both Smartphone’s in this standard. Overall, both the Smartphone’s will perform with same speed and efficiency when it comes to performance.
See AlsoMotorola Moto G 2nd gen 2014 PC Suite download

4. Storage: Moto G 2nd Gen. is available in 8GB and 16GB variants however Xperia E3 has only got 4GB storage capacity. Both the Smartphone’s storage is upgradable up to 32GB via SD card. But one way or other the fact still remains the same that Moto G 2nd Gen. provides better storage options.

5. Network and connectivity: Moto G 2nd Gen is compatible with 2G and 3G networks but Xperia E3 shows compatibility with 2G, 3G and 4G networks. Thus, Xperia E3 takes lead by providing higher network compatibility. The rest of the connectivity modes for both the Smartphone’s include GPS, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc.

6. Battery Backup: Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen. is packed with a2070mAh battery while as Xperia E3 has got 2330mAh battery provides talk time of 12h. Moto G 2nd Gen. battery talk time is yet unknown but would also give a good day of usage since 200mAh or above 2000mAh battery is good for Smartphone of this standard.

After going through the thorough dissection, we come to conclude that Moto G 2nd Gen is better in display quality, camera clarity as well as storage capacity however other features are also rightly specified thus being our recommended choice for 3G users. However if you want to go for 4G enabled Xperia E3, you would have to compromise for what Moto G 2nd Gen. is offering. Overall Moto G 2014 is the perfectly designed flagship as compared to Xperia E3.
See AlsoSony Xperia PC Companion or PC Suite download for all devices

by -
0 1458

Xolo Play 8x-1200 is the latest richly configured flagship from Xolo released in July 2014. Micromax Canvas gold belongs to the same standard of configuration and affordability. Both these Smartphone’s are aiming to produce the best possible processing configuration as well as built design to run every high end game and applications also tweaking little into a phablet design. Physically both of them are alike in looks Canvas Gold being little more curvy and big. For you to choose the best one among the two we have evaluated both of them and the results are right before you. Take a look below.

Xolo Play 8x 1200 Vs Micromax Canvas Gold A300

Xolo Play 8x 1200 Vs. Micromax Canvas Gold A300

1. Visual Experience: Xolo Play 8x flaunts a 5.0inches IPS LCD display with screen resolution of 1080*1920pixels and pixel density of 441ppi. Canvas Gold on the other hand houses a 5.5inches LTPS LCD display with resolution of 1080*1920pixels and pixel density of 401ppi. The quality of both these displays is just superb. It’s totally your choice that whether you want a little bigger display or just 5.0inches. Otherwise the clarity is awesome in both the cases. If you are going for gaming, then we suggest the bigger the better.

2. Processing Experience: Xolo Play 8x-1200 installed with Android v4.4.2 Kit Kat OS operates on Octa Core MediaTek processor clocked at 2GHz speed and 2GB RAM for efficient multi tasking and application support. Canvas Gold is also launched with Android v4.4.2 Kit Kat OS operating on Octa core MediaTek processor clocked at 2GHz of speed and coupled with 2GB RAM. In processing, these turn out to be twins with same processing speed as well as efficiency. However Mali 450MP4 GPU is present in Xolo Play 8 x-1200.

See Also – Top 5 Games for Lava Xolo Play 8x-1200 Download

3. Camera Clarity: A 13MP primary camera with dual LED flash and 5MP front shooter with LED flash is seen in case of Xolo Play 8x-1200. Canvas Gold has got a 16MP primary camera with LED flash and 5MP auto focus front camera. Both the camera configurations are good but Canvas Gold with 16MP camera being the better one.

4. Storage: Both these Smartphone’s are provided with non- expandable 32Gb internal storage. So, no competition arises here as good amount of storage is seen from both the cases.

5. Network and Connectivity: In this segment also no diversity is seen, both are 2G and 3G network compatible having basic modes of connectivity as present in every Android Smartphone namely Wi-Fi, GPS, Bluetooth, etc.

6. Battery Backup: Xolo Play 8x – 1200 comes with 2300mAh Li-ion battery giving 24h on 2G and 11h 45min on 3G network and 2300mAh Li-Po battery is seen in Canvas Gold giving 8hours of talk time. In this section definitely Xolo Play 8x-1200 has got upper hand with better battery backup than Canvas Gold.

From the comparison it’s pretty clear that both the developers have done a good piece of work. The choice is always on you, if you want a bigger display and better camera quality, you should go for Canvas Gold but watch out the battery drainage. However if you stick to 5.0inches display and 13MP primary camera, you will get good processing as well as battery timing in Xolo Play 8X – 1200
See Also – Micromax Canvas Gold PC Suite download

by -
0 1364

The ever expanding Canvas series of Micromax got its new member recently in the month of September 2014 namely Canvas Nitro A310. This is a richly featured budget Smartphone from Micromax expecting to give best specifications at least price as Micromax has always taken this point in concern. Canvas Knight A350 was released in March 2014 and was welcomed by the world whole heartedly. Both these Smartphone’s belong to the same series as well as same conception behind their development. To finish off your curiosity about buying one among the two, here we will compare these Smartphone’s head on head and most importantly bit by bit so that it will be clear to you that which one should be chosen among these two Smartphone’s.

Micromax Canvas Knight A350 vs. Micromax Canvas Nitro A310

Display Quality: Canvas Knight flaunts a 5.00 inches capacitive display with resolution of 1080×1920 pixels and pixel density of 443ppi. On the other side Canvas Nitro houses a 5.00 inches IPS LCD display with resolution of 720x1280pixels and pixel density of 294ppi. Clearly Canvas Knight has got the best display quality as compared to canvas nitro but as long as this resolution of Canvas Nitro is considered, it is not too bad though. Oleo phobic coating is also present over the display of Canvas Nitro A310.

Performance: Canvas Knight comes pre-installed with Android v4.2.2 Jelly Bean and operates on Octa core MediaTek processor clocked at 2GHz speed. This lightning fast processor is coupled with 2GB RAM to produced speed as well as efficiency at their peak. Canvas Nitro however comes installed with Android v4.4.2 KitKat operating on Octa core MediaTek processor clocked at 1.7Ghz speed and coupled with 2GB RAM. In this case both the Smartphone’s have got good processor configuration but Canvas Knight is slightly faster than Canvas Nitro but it won’t affect much on the performance because 1.7GHz of speed is also better and since good amount of RAM is present in both the cases.

Camera Clarity: This is the most essential segment of comparison where majority of Smartphone’s collide and the results turn the tables so watch it carefully. Canvas Knight houses a 16MP primary camera along with LED flash and 8MP front facing camera for good quality video chat. However Canvas Nitro comprises of 13MP primary camera with LED flash and 5MP front facing camera. Here too Canvas Knight has got better camera configuration than Nitro but Nitro has also got good configuration at its standard.

Storage: Canvas Knight has got 32GB internal storage while as Canvas Nitro has got just 8GB internal storage. However its internal storage can be expanded up to 32GB via SD card.

Network and Connectivity: Both the Smartphone’s support 2G and 3G networks and connectivity modes are Bluetooth, WI-Fi, GPS, etc. As usual no great diversity among the Smartphone’s is seen here as Smartphone’s belong to the same line.

Battery Back Up: Canvas Knight is packed with a 2350mAh non removable Li-ion battery while as Canvas Nitro houses a 2500mAh battery providing 10h of talk time. This would make a difference and obviously good for canvas Nitro.

After taking a look at all the sections above we come to the conclusion that Canvas Knight is better as compared to canvas Nitro in case of display, camera and processing speed but in case of battery backup, Canvas Nitro is better. As majority of goodness is present in Canvas Knight so it will be our winner here but if you love a Smartphone with good specifications as well as good battery you can go for Canvas Nitro too because it’s specifications are also good to some extent which can also give you the good Smartphone experience. However if you love every feature at its biggest outline, then Canvas Knight should be your choice.

by -
0 1311

This is a epic battle of Smartphone’s between two classic rivals Samsung and Nokia who has always tried to dominate over one another with their technologies and quality. After a long year of cold war between the official of Nokia in their own set of protocols related to the company management, they have get back on their feet again. No matter Samsung has travelled too forward in technology as compared to Nokia but still Nokia is carrying on same genes of perfection to their upcoming generation of Smartphone’s. Here today we will see who has got the best stuff embedded deep inside both performance wise as well as the main architecture.

 Samsung galaxy S4 Zoom vs Nokia Lumia 1020

1. Built in Design and Display: Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom as well as Lumia 1020 is latest high end Smartphone which were both unveiled in July 2013. This Smartphone is packed with the dimensions of 125.5*63.5*15.4mm. It flaunts a 4.3inch super AMOLED display with resolution of 540*960pixels and moderate pixel density of 256ppi. This good quality display is sheltered by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 for the best protection. On the other hand, Nokia Lumia 1020 is available in dimensions of 130.4*71.4*10.4mm weighing about 158 grams. This Smartphone houses a 4.5inch AMOLED display with screen resolution of 768*1280pixels and pixel density of 332ppi. Here we can see the impact of Nokia display has totally dominated over this Samsung Smartphone clearly leaving an impact on your mind that Nokia has still got that instinct to be the best. The Lumia 1020 display quality is highly exceptional as compared to Galaxy S4 Zoom.

2. Performance: Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom runs on comes installed with Android v4.2.2 Jelly bean OS which is upgradable to latest version of Android which is v4.4.2 Kit Kat. Lumia 1020 runs on Windows Phone 8 OS which is also upgraded to latest Windows Phone 8.1 OS. Here as a operating system switch between these two Smartphone’s as they run on totally different platforms. Windows lovers can get the windows running Smartphone while as for people addicted to Android, they can have it. However the OS competition is stiff and Android is still better and more stable than windows OS but only in certain cases, it’s just the matter of time that they will be competing on equal standards because windows is also making every application running possible on their OS. So, choosing OS depends upon your taste however professionals believe in Windows. Talking about processor, Samsung Galaxy S4 operates on a Pega dual cortex A9 dual core processor clocked at 1.5GHz speed. Lumia 1020 operates on a dual core Qualcomm Snapdragon processor also clocked a 1.5GHz of speed and perfectly coupled with 2GB RAM. Here the processor battle almost ends up at tie with same number of cores as well as speed. But Samsung S4 Zoom is coupled with 1.5GB RAM and Lumia 1020 with complete 2GB. Here the 0.5GB RAM is extra in case of Lumia 1020 but the overall performance will be best for both devices because negligible amount of effect will be seen because of extra amount of RAM.

3. Camera: Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom sports a 16MP camera with picture resolution of 4608*3456pixels featuring auto focus, 10x optical zoom, optical image stabilisation and Xenon Flash.  A 1.9Mp secondary shooter is also present for video calling features and the rest. Lumia 1020 completely shatters this average camera of Samsung S4 Zoom with its crisp and clear Carl Zeiss optics 41MP camera having picture resolution of 7152*5368pixels featuring optical image stabilisation, auto/ manual focus, Xenon as well as LED Flash, Pure view technology, dual capture, etc. For video chatting feature a 1.2MP shooter is present at the front.  This criterion perfectly judges the best contender among these present before you.

4. Network and Connectivity: Not much diversity is seen present between these two Smartphone’s in this aspect. Both are 4G enabled Smartphone with connectivity features including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC and GPS. However Samsung Galaxy S4 has got better Bluetooth v4.0 as compared to Lumia 1020 possessing v3.0 but it doesn’t make any great effect on their speeds.

5. Storage: Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom is available with 8GB internal storage from which only 5GB is accessible to user. Lumia 1020 possesses a huge 32GB internal storage in general which is highly incredible. However Samsung S4 Zoom storage is expandable up to 64GB via SD card but it won’t neglect the fact that this Smartphone is having ordinary amount of storage on its own.  Lumia 1020 doesn’t even need an SD card with such massive amount of storage.

6. Backup: Samsung Galaxy S4 packs a 2330mAh Li-ion battery giving talk time of up to 13 hours. While as Lumia 1020 packs a 200mAh Li-ion battery giving 19h of talk time clearly enlighten that Windows is less power consuming OS than Android. Since ages, Android is facing issues with battery, so Windows is better in this regard.

All the above specifications clearly give the indication the Nokia Lumia 1020 is better in case of camera, display, battery and storage. This is one of the best Windows phone ever and highly advanced as compared to Galaxy S4 Zoom whose features just count to be average as compared to this Nokia beast.

by -
0 652

After releasing few successful models of their Eluga range of Smartphone’s like Power, DL1, Panasonic is now moving towards further expansion of this midrange Smartphone series by introducing their new Smartphone Panasonic Eluga U in the game and is expected to be dropped in the market in this month. Since the mid range Smartphone market is presently taken over by the brilliant Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 3, here we want to give the glimpse of post collision vision between these Smartphone’s however the collision is yet to occur. This will enable the world to choose better option for them without even getting a second though and without any confusion in mind.

panasonic eluga u vs xiaomi mi3
See Also – Download Panasonic Pc suite and USB drivers, all Android Devices
1. Display Quality Testing: Panasonic Eluga U is an elegantly designed Smartphone housing a 5.0inch LCD display with resolution of 720*1280pixels at pixel density of 294ppi along with Gorilla Glass 3 protection. On the other side, Xiaomi Mi3 flaunts a 5inch LCD display with resolution of 1080*1920 pixels and pixel density of 441ppi.  It also comes coated with corning Gorilla Glass 3. Clearly Xiaomi MI3 display quality has completely outshined the display of Panasonic Eluga U. No matter if the display size is same but quality matters which is present in Xiaomi Mi3.

2. Camera Distinction: Panasonic Eluga U comprises of a 13MP camera capturing pics at resolution of 4128*3096pixels featuring autofocus and LED flash and can shoot videos with 1080p @30fps quality. However Xiaomi Mi 3 also flaunts a 13 MP Autofocus camera with same resolution but with dual LED flash which is single in cases of Eluga U. Face and Smile detection and HDR are the additional camera features exclusively present in Xiaomi Mi3. Likewise 2MP front shooter is housed in Xiaomi Mi3. So far we can conclude that in this section, not too much distinction is seen but a dual LED flash is better in case of Xiaomi Mi3 but this factor is easy compromising.

3.  Performance Analysis: Panasonic Eluga U is pre installed with Android OS v4.4.2 Kit Kat and operates on 1.2 GHz Quad core Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor. Xiaomi Mi3 with Android v4.3 out of box is upgradable to Android v4.4.2 Kit Kat and operates on 2.3GHz Quad core Snapdragon 800 processor along with Adreno 330 GPU. This simply shows that Xiaomi Mi3 will be much faster at work as compared to Panasonic Eluga U. However both the processors are equipped with 2GB of RAM which is help the processor of Eluga U to work better and smooth and in case of Xiaomi Mi 3 it will just rock the Smartphone with speed and efficiency.

4. Storage Capacities: Panasoni Eluga U comes with 16GB of internal storage and is expandable up to 32GB via SD card. However Xiaomi Mi3 has got 2 variants with 16GB and 32GB storage capacity also expandable up to 32GB via SD card. Here also Xiaomi Mi 3 provides better choices but this aspect could have been compromising like dual LED flash in case of Xiaomi Mi3.

5.  Performance and Connectivity: Not much difference can be felt here because both being the 3G compatible Smartphone’s possess identical options fr connectivity which includes Bluetooth v4.0, GPS, Wi-Fi, etc. So no decisions for choosing the Smartphone can be made while looking at this section, hence minimising it.

6. Battery Back Up:  Panasoni Eluga U houses a 2500mAh battery but no info is yet available auto it’s talk time while as Xiaomi Mi3 packs 3050mAh battery with talk time of 25 h expectedly better than Eluga U.

After investigating all the spots of these Smartphone’s, Xiaomi Mi 3 is concluded to be the winner of this game with better speed and display quality along with little more advancement in other sections too. In comparison with Xiaomi Mi 3 this configuration of Panasonic Eluga U can’t with stand but for the other few Smartphone’s it can also prove a fair configuration.
See Also – Xiaomi MI3 PC Suite download and USB drivers download

by -
0 605

OnePlus is the brand new Chinese Smartphone manufacturing firm founded in Dec 17 2013. They have released their first flagship Killer Smartphone labelled OnePlus One in April 2014 with stunning features and impressive price tagging. So, here today we are about to do a close encounter between this OnePlus One and the record breaker loved one of India market Xiaomi Mi 3 which Is also a Chinese technology product. Both these Smartphone’s have dedicated a ground breaking entry to their manufacturers. Let’s dissect both these flagships and investigate which one is the best among these. This dissection will be very thorough and provided with trust worthy results from PhoneLance Inc. so that you can get the best one.

OnePlus One Vs Xiaomi MI3

1.  Display Distinction: The latest contender OnePlus One flaunts a full HD 5.5inches LTPS LCD display with resolution of 1080*1920pixels and impressive pixel density of 401ppi. This brilliant display is sheltered by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 and supports multi touch up to 10 fingers. On the other end Xiaomi Mi 3 houses a 5.0inches full HD LCD display with resolution of 1080*1920pixels and pixel density of 441ppi coated by Corning Gorilla Glass 3. This can be clearly seen that both displays are high quality in same proportion. The little low pixel density of OnePlus One is due to 0.5inch bigger display than Mi 3 other wise display quality is totally same. Here we can say that it is your choice that whether you want a high quality bigger display or a high quality medium sized display.

2. Performance: OnePlus one comes pre-installed with Android v4.4.2 Kit Kat where as Mi3 can also be upgraded from Android v4.3 Jellybean to latest v4.4.2 Kit Kat. OnePlus one operates on a Quad core Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor clocked at 2.5GHz alongside coupled with 3GB RAM. Xiaomi MI3 on the other hand operated on a Quad core Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor clocked at speed of 2.3GHz speed and coupled with 2GB RAM. However both the Smartphone’s are provided with Adreno 330 GPU for enhanced graphics support. The performance distinction clearly indicates that OnePlus One has got here processing capabilities as well as multi-tasking efficiency than Xiaomi Mi3 which is also a good Smartphone in comparison with a wide range of other Smartphone’s. In this essential class of dissection, One has taken lead.

3. Superior Moment Capturing: OnePlus One is provided with a 13MP auto focus primary camera along with dual LED flash capturing pictures with resolution of 4128*3096pixels. The additional features present are geo-tagging, touch focus, and face detection, panorama and HDR. It can capture videos of 2160p@30fps, 2160(DCI) @24p, 1080p@60fps and 720p@120fps. A 5MP front shooter is present for enjoying clear video calling and selfies and this shooter can also capture videos of 1080p@30fps. Taking a look at Xiaomi Mi3, it also houses a 13MP camera with same picture capturing quality as well as other features. It can capture videos of 1080p@30fps only. In this case a 2MP front shooter is present for video chatting and video capturing with quality of 1080p@30fps. Here the fight is a tie when it comes to the main camera but OnePlus with 5MP front shooter wins the fight with better front camera and better diversity in capturing videos.

4. Data Holding Capacity: OnePlus One as well as Xiaomi Mi 3 is available in two storage variants which include 16GB and 64GB. Xiaomi. Giving a good amount of storage to owners, both of these Smartphone are made devoid of SD card slot which hardly matters when you get a good storage capacity like this. In this aspect comes out to be same for both the Smartphone’s.

5. Network and connectivity: OnePlus One Smartphone is compatible with 2G, 3G and 4G LTE networks with frequencies as follows:

2G: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 /1900

3G: HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100

4G: LTE 700/ 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2300 / 2600

Xiaomi Mi3 supports 2G and 3G networks and is devoid of 4G compatibility. The range of frequencies for 2G and 3G are provided below:

2G: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900

3G: HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100

OnePlus One is the recommended choice in this case also because of its 4G compatibility as well as better 3G frequency support.

The rest of the connectivity features are almost identical to these Smartphone’s and also with the rest of high end Smartphone’s which include Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC and GPS. However Bluetooth makes a difference here as OnePlus has got Bluetooth v4.1 which is rarely found and the newly upgraded version however Xiaomi Mi3 possesses v4.0 which is found in majority of Smartphone’s at present. So expectedly Bluetooth speed of one will be better than Xiaomi Mi3.

6. Endurance period: OnePlus one houses a non removable Li-Po 3100mAh battery while as Xiaomi Mi3 is packed with 3050mAh Li-ion battery providing talk time of 25 hours. However the estimated battery backup of one is unknown yet but expected to be the best like its other features while the 3100mAh looks good at giving longer battery backup.

After dissecting both the Smartphone’s, we came to the conclusion that OnePlus One is indeed a much better especially faster Smartphone as compared to Xiaomi Mi3. One is our recommended winner but we can’t neglect the fact that Xiaomi Mi3 has also shown up high class features in its class and has defeated wide range of famed Smartphone’s so far. The fact behind the win of OnePlus win is that they have integrated implemented and introduced the stuff in their Smartphone beyond certain standards and enough to compete with Galaxy s5 and rest of the famed Smartphone’s.

by -
0 871

Moto E is presently the most amazingly featured mid range Smartphone with attractive price tag. It was unveiled by Motorola in May 2014 and put forth for market in the same month. This gained a huge fame and fans from all over the world because of its exceptional features hardly possible to be provided at this range. This Smartphone was mimicked by various emerging manufacturers like Micromax because of its popularity. On the other hand Asus Zenfone4 is also a mid ranger from Asus with quite attractive price and specifications. It was unveiled to the world in January 2014 and stated rolling out in May 2014. The most essential factor which we have to concentrate here is that whether Zenfone4 has got the spark to prove itself better than Moto E or will Moto E still continue to be the undisputed best mid range Smartphone. Here you will clearly get the answer which will be most favourable to you. So, let’s step toward our analysis.

Motorola Moto E vs Asus Zenfone 4

1. Display Superiority:

Moto E flaunts a 4.3 inch capacitive display with resolution of 540*960 pixels and pixel density of 256ppi, while as Asus Zenfone4 comprises of a 4inch TFT display with resolution of 480*800 pixels and pixel density of 233ppi. Quite clearly Moto E has got a better display size as well as display quality. Smartphone experience will be much crispier and clearer in case of Moto E instead of Zenfon4 with just 49nch screen with low resolution.

2. Best Performer:

Moto E comes installed with Android Kit Kat 4.4.2 which is upgradable to Android v4.4.2. Zenfone4 comes preinstalled with Android v4.3 Jellybean which is also upgradable to the latest Android 4.4.2 Kit Kat. This implies that both the Smartphone’s have got equally up to date operating system at present. Moto E operates on Quad core 1.2GHz Snapdragon 200 processor and Adreno 302 for graphical assistance. Zenfone4 operates on dual core Intel atom processor also clocked at 1.2GHz. A powerVR GPU is provided for better graphical operations. Since the processing speeds of both the Smartphone’s is same however Moto E is expected to function little more efficiently with its work load distributed among four cores instead of just two cores. Due to same speed this effect will be only lightly noticeable or will remain recessive. Besides this, both these Smartphone’s have got 1GB of RAM for efficient multi tasking and better application support. This is very nice move from both developers.

3. Camera Clarity: 

Moto E as well as Zenfone4 houses a 5MP camera with almost identical features like face detection, panorama, etc. However Zenfone4 can capture 1080p videos @30 fps. And Moto E can capture 480p videos @30fps too. Not much diversity is seen their primary camera. In case of Moto E no secondary shooter is present unexpectedly however Zenfone4 has got a VGA secondary camera for video calling. This is a step ahead of Moto E by Zenfone4 and will be surely beneficial for them.

4. Network and Connectivity:

Just like every other mid range Smartphone, both these Smartphone’s are 3G enabled and include connectivity features which are Bluetooth, WI-FI, GPS. The connectivity is never a deciding factor because it’s identical for majority of Smartphone’s whether high end or mid range Smartphone. These are the basic requirements to be an Android phone and this is going on since the release of 1st Android.

5. Storage:

Moto E comprises of 4GB internal storage and it is expandable up to 32GB via SD card.4GB is the basic storage capacity flaunted by most of the mid range Smartphone’s. Zenfone4 has got 2 variants in which one has got 4GB storage while as other one houses 8GB internal storage and both the variants support SD card compatibility up to 64GB. You can choose one of the given variant according to your storage needs. Nothing special is seen here In case of Moto E but Zenfone4 has at least given you the choice to choose from two variants.

6. Running Period:

Moto E is packed with a 1980mAh battery giving 12h of talk time while as Zenfone4 has got 1200/1600mAh LI Po battery providing talk-time of 10h. In this aspect, both have got the close battery life but Moto E has indeed got the better battery backup as compared to Zenfone4. This is good for both but better for Moto E, Zenfone4 should have to increase its battery power knowing the need of battery when it comes to Android.

Looking at the different ads and cons of these two Smartphone’s, we can say that Moto E is better in case of display, battery and a little ahead in processor. However Zenfone4 can be considered as a choice because at least it has got a secondary camera and the rest of the features are also good. For the people who want better display as well as back up than Zenfon4, they should go for Moto E, but for the people who enjoy video calling, Zenfone4 is the preferred choice, you would have to compromise a little in case of display quality however 10h battery backup and processor is good. The applications multitasking governed by RAM of a Smartphone are identical in both the cases so switching different applications will be smoother equally in both Smartphone’s. Also both of these are up to date with the current version of Android which is exceptional for a Smartphone of this price to be getting regularly updated from the source.  Moto E will be our recommended choice because of its better features as compared to Zenfone4 but the only pinching thing from it is being devoid of front camera. This can give better opportunity to Zenfone4 to be explored by the world.


by -
0 1147

Zenfone 5 was released by Asus few months back in April to add up a new competitor in its line up of high end Smartphone’s. However Moto X is the high end product of Motorola released last year in August. It was the main dominant among high range Smartphone’s and still has got that lightning spark. Let’s see the best one out of these two highly featured Smartphone’s from two diverse origins and know whether Zenfone range can compete with Moto range or it’s just a delusion.

Asus Zenfone 5 VS Motorola Moto X

1. Display: Asus Zenfone5 flaunts a 5inch IPS display with screen resolution of 720*1280pixels and pixel density of 249ppi. This vibrant display comes protected with Corning Gorilla Glass 3. On the other side, Moto X houses a 4.7inch AMOLED display with resolution of 720*1280pixels and pixel density of 312ppi also sheltered with Gorilla Glass 3. Since the display resolution of both the Smartphone’s is same and there’s just a minute difference in their sizes which creates difference in their pixel densities, which means both the Smartphone’s have got the same taste towards display but AMOLED technology will be a plus point for Moto X but it can go recessive under the influence of 0.2inch bugger screen of Zenfone5 but overall it’s a fix.

2. Processor and Operating System: Zenfone5 runs on android OS v4.3 jelly bean which is upgradable to Android Kit Kat 4.4.2, where as For Moto X, it runs on Android 4.2.2 jellybean which is upgradable to Android v4.4.4 Kit Kat. Both the Smartphone’s are equivalently upgradable to higher versions but Moto X has got a little higher updated version. Zenfone5 operates on Quad core Intel Atom processor producing speed of 1.6 GHz for one variant has 2GHz for the other one but here we will be talking of higher version . It’s your choice to choose from. Moto X operates on Qualcomm Snapdragon processor clocked at a speed of 1.7GHz. Moto X as well as Zenfone5 processor is coupled with 2GB of RAM to maximise their performance. The lower variant of Zenfone5 has got 1GB RAM. But if we look at these Smartphone’s on the peak value, the huge 2GHz speed of Intel Atom is worth admiring as compared to 1.7 GHz from Snapdragon but 1.7 is also the best processing speed. Adreno 320 GPU for Moto X and PowerVR GPU for ZEnfone5 are also present.

3. Camera: Zenfone5 has got an 8MP primary camera producing picture resolution of 3264*2448pixels along with geo tagging, auto focus and LED Flash. It records 1080p videos @30fps. Moto X on the other hand owns a 10MP primary camera with picture resolution of 4320*2432pixels and has got features like auto focus, LED flash, geo tagging, panorama, etc. and just like Zenfone5 it can also record 1080p videos @30fps and has also got 2MP front shooter. Clearly Moto X is taking a lead in camera point of view.

4. Storage: Zenfone5 has got 2 variant with different storage capacities. Lower variant has got 8GB internal storage and higher one has got 16 GB and both are expandable up to 64BG via SD card. Moto X on the other hand has got much larger diversity of Moto X with different storage variants and same specifications which include 16, 32 and 64GB. The storage capacities are good for all because SD card slot is absent.

5. Network and Connectivity: Zenfone5 is compatible with 2G and 3G networks but gets completely outshined by 4G feature flaunted in Moto X. The rest of the connectivity features include WIFI, Bluetooth 4.0 and USB present equally in both devices but 4G of Moto X leaves Zenfone5 faded.

6. Battery Backup: Zenfone5 comprises of 2110mAh LI-Po battery giving talk time of 14-16 hours where as Moto X is packed with a 2200mAh Li-ion battery giving talks time of 13hours. Thus the battery backup is also identical but little extra time is being expected from Zenfone5.

Looking at the Specifications above we recommend Moto X to be our ultimate choice because of its better camera and 4G also processor speed is good. Despite of better processing speed of Zenfone5it still lags behind from Moto X because of its quality high end camera and storage choices are also better for Moto X.