Tags Posts tagged with "full comaprison"

full comaprison

by -
0 905

The eternal Note series of Smartphone’s by Samsung dates back to 2011 when the first Note came into existence with a bigger display than ever giving a great sales count to Samsung along with the fame. The same adrenaline rush is experienced even these days when we get hold of a monstrous Note 4 Smartphone, being the most premium Smartphone ever by Samsung. Finally looks like some competitive phase has started for the Galaxy Note 4 with the unveiling of highly configured Smartphone Xiaomi Mi Note Pro by the Chinese manufacturer Xiaomi who has been making headlines since last year and has given push to 2015 with this gigantic Xiaomi Mi Note Pro Smartphone highly competitive for most of the top class Smartphone’s in the premium range. So, here today we have fixed up a full on comparison analysis between these Smartphone’s to get the perfect one out of these. The competition looks a bit unbalanced bit trust Phone Lane, our vision says Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has got the spark to stand against Galaxy Note 4. So, let’s head straight towards the arena.

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Vs Xiaomi Mi Note Pro

1. Build Quality and Display: Fatefully, both these Smartphone’s are endowed with howling 5.7 inches display with similar resolution of 1440*2560 pixels and pixel density of 515 ppi. The only difference lies in the fact that Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has got IPS LCD display and Galaxy Note 4 has got super AMOLED display, but at the end of the day, quality as well as quantity is similar that is what matters. However unlike Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, Galaxy Note 4 features Corning Gorilla Glass 4, where as Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is sheltered with Corning Gorilla Glass 3. In case of build quality, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro incorporates Corning Gorilla Glass 3 back panel where as Samsung Galaxy Note 4 comes with leathery back and both these Smartphone’s are surrounded by metallic rim. Thus overall, both the Smartphone’s are greatly engineered according to different conceptions providing a flawless zeal and zest.

2. Performance: The performance of a Smartphone depends upon its internal architecture whether and the OS. So, let’s take a keen observation of those chipsets. Galaxy Note 4 comes pre-installed with Android v 4.4.4 Kit Kat upgradable to v 5.0 Lollipop as soon as it’s made available. It operates on a Quad core Snapdragon 805 processor clocked at 2.7 GHz accompanied by 3GB RAM and Adreno 420 GPU at its best. On the other hand, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro will be shipping with Android v5.0.1 Lollipop OS operating on a Quad core Snapdragon 810 processor clocked at 1.5 GHz accompanied by 4 GB RAM and Adreno 430 GPU. Thus, it’s clear that Xiaomi Mi Note Pro as well as Galaxy Note 4 has got good stuff inside however an extra gigabyte of RAM in case of Xiaomi Mi Note Pro will make it a bit more beastly in installation and working of different applications, also GPU of this Smartphone is better upgraded than Galaxy Note 4. However a big more clocking speed is seen in highest variant of Galaxy Note 4 which is in the game. It wouldn’t make much difference though.

3. Camera Clarity: Intermixed observations are being seen in this scenario with both Smartphone’s at their best. Xiaomi Mi Note Pro flaunting a 13 MP rear camera and 4 MP front shooter, while as Galaxy Note 4 houses 16 MP rear camera and 3.7 MP front shooter. The situation being twisted but clear though, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has got few less megapixels as compared to Galaxy Note 4 but in case of front shooter Galaxy Note 4 has got lesser megapixels making it bit lesser choice for selfie revolution. If you want both the cameras to do well, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is there however if rear camera matters for you more than anything, Galaxy Note 4 is for you.

4. Storage: Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is present with 64 GB onboard storage without SD card compatibility, where as Galaxy Note 4 has got 32 GB internal storage and expandability up to 128 GB. Although 64 GB is enough storage for a Smartphone to be ideal but Galaxy Note 4 with it’s expanding option can store more. The choice here depends up on the storage needs of a buyer.

5. Battery Endurance: Being crammed with a 3220 mAh Li-ion battery, Galaxy Note 4 has got the endurance to provide 20 hours on 3G, while as Xiaomi Mi Note Pro with 3090 mAh Li-Po battery is also expected to provide good back up, however, exact values are not evaluated for Xiaomi Mi Note Pro yet. Observations suggest Galaxy Note 4 will be giving a few more hours of freedom than Xiaomi Mi Note Pro.

After going through all the stuff engulfed by these beasts, the competition reveals that both have got the upper hand in display and build quality, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro with extra gigabyte and upgraded GPU as well as chipset has upper hand over Galaxy Note 4, rear camera is a bit improved in Galaxy Note 4 and battery is awesome in Galaxy Note 4 but good in Xiaomi Mi Note Pro. We must not neglect the price we are paying for these Smartphone, as Galaxy Note 4 couldn’t totally over power Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, thus it still resides in the game. You have got freedom to spend bundles on Galaxy Note 4 or enjoy lookalike features at much lower pricing. Since both the Smartphone have got almost same features, price conscious buyers wanting best experience will prefer Xiaomi Mi Note Pro however people who don’t care about pricing can go for Galaxy Note 4.

by -
0 1622

Xolo Play 8x-1200 is the latest richly configured flagship from Xolo released in July 2014. Micromax Canvas gold belongs to the same standard of configuration and affordability. Both these Smartphone’s are aiming to produce the best possible processing configuration as well as built design to run every high end game and applications also tweaking little into a phablet design. Physically both of them are alike in looks Canvas Gold being little more curvy and big. For you to choose the best one among the two we have evaluated both of them and the results are right before you. Take a look below.

Xolo Play 8x 1200 Vs Micromax Canvas Gold A300

Xolo Play 8x 1200 Vs. Micromax Canvas Gold A300

1. Visual Experience: Xolo Play 8x flaunts a 5.0inches IPS LCD display with screen resolution of 1080*1920pixels and pixel density of 441ppi. Canvas Gold on the other hand houses a 5.5inches LTPS LCD display with resolution of 1080*1920pixels and pixel density of 401ppi. The quality of both these displays is just superb. It’s totally your choice that whether you want a little bigger display or just 5.0inches. Otherwise the clarity is awesome in both the cases. If you are going for gaming, then we suggest the bigger the better.

2. Processing Experience: Xolo Play 8x-1200 installed with Android v4.4.2 Kit Kat OS operates on Octa Core MediaTek processor clocked at 2GHz speed and 2GB RAM for efficient multi tasking and application support. Canvas Gold is also launched with Android v4.4.2 Kit Kat OS operating on Octa core MediaTek processor clocked at 2GHz of speed and coupled with 2GB RAM. In processing, these turn out to be twins with same processing speed as well as efficiency. However Mali 450MP4 GPU is present in Xolo Play 8 x-1200.

See Also – Top 5 Games for Lava Xolo Play 8x-1200 Download

3. Camera Clarity: A 13MP primary camera with dual LED flash and 5MP front shooter with LED flash is seen in case of Xolo Play 8x-1200. Canvas Gold has got a 16MP primary camera with LED flash and 5MP auto focus front camera. Both the camera configurations are good but Canvas Gold with 16MP camera being the better one.

4. Storage: Both these Smartphone’s are provided with non- expandable 32Gb internal storage. So, no competition arises here as good amount of storage is seen from both the cases.

5. Network and Connectivity: In this segment also no diversity is seen, both are 2G and 3G network compatible having basic modes of connectivity as present in every Android Smartphone namely Wi-Fi, GPS, Bluetooth, etc.

6. Battery Backup: Xolo Play 8x – 1200 comes with 2300mAh Li-ion battery giving 24h on 2G and 11h 45min on 3G network and 2300mAh Li-Po battery is seen in Canvas Gold giving 8hours of talk time. In this section definitely Xolo Play 8x-1200 has got upper hand with better battery backup than Canvas Gold.

From the comparison it’s pretty clear that both the developers have done a good piece of work. The choice is always on you, if you want a bigger display and better camera quality, you should go for Canvas Gold but watch out the battery drainage. However if you stick to 5.0inches display and 13MP primary camera, you will get good processing as well as battery timing in Xolo Play 8X – 1200
See Also – Micromax Canvas Gold PC Suite download

by -
0 1523

The ever expanding Canvas series of Micromax got its new member recently in the month of September 2014 namely Canvas Nitro A310. This is a richly featured budget Smartphone from Micromax expecting to give best specifications at least price as Micromax has always taken this point in concern. Canvas Knight A350 was released in March 2014 and was welcomed by the world whole heartedly. Both these Smartphone’s belong to the same series as well as same conception behind their development. To finish off your curiosity about buying one among the two, here we will compare these Smartphone’s head on head and most importantly bit by bit so that it will be clear to you that which one should be chosen among these two Smartphone’s.

Micromax Canvas Knight A350 vs. Micromax Canvas Nitro A310

Display Quality: Canvas Knight flaunts a 5.00 inches capacitive display with resolution of 1080×1920 pixels and pixel density of 443ppi. On the other side Canvas Nitro houses a 5.00 inches IPS LCD display with resolution of 720x1280pixels and pixel density of 294ppi. Clearly Canvas Knight has got the best display quality as compared to canvas nitro but as long as this resolution of Canvas Nitro is considered, it is not too bad though. Oleo phobic coating is also present over the display of Canvas Nitro A310.

Performance: Canvas Knight comes pre-installed with Android v4.2.2 Jelly Bean and operates on Octa core MediaTek processor clocked at 2GHz speed. This lightning fast processor is coupled with 2GB RAM to produced speed as well as efficiency at their peak. Canvas Nitro however comes installed with Android v4.4.2 KitKat operating on Octa core MediaTek processor clocked at 1.7Ghz speed and coupled with 2GB RAM. In this case both the Smartphone’s have got good processor configuration but Canvas Knight is slightly faster than Canvas Nitro but it won’t affect much on the performance because 1.7GHz of speed is also better and since good amount of RAM is present in both the cases.

Camera Clarity: This is the most essential segment of comparison where majority of Smartphone’s collide and the results turn the tables so watch it carefully. Canvas Knight houses a 16MP primary camera along with LED flash and 8MP front facing camera for good quality video chat. However Canvas Nitro comprises of 13MP primary camera with LED flash and 5MP front facing camera. Here too Canvas Knight has got better camera configuration than Nitro but Nitro has also got good configuration at its standard.

Storage: Canvas Knight has got 32GB internal storage while as Canvas Nitro has got just 8GB internal storage. However its internal storage can be expanded up to 32GB via SD card.

Network and Connectivity: Both the Smartphone’s support 2G and 3G networks and connectivity modes are Bluetooth, WI-Fi, GPS, etc. As usual no great diversity among the Smartphone’s is seen here as Smartphone’s belong to the same line.

Battery Back Up: Canvas Knight is packed with a 2350mAh non removable Li-ion battery while as Canvas Nitro houses a 2500mAh battery providing 10h of talk time. This would make a difference and obviously good for canvas Nitro.

After taking a look at all the sections above we come to the conclusion that Canvas Knight is better as compared to canvas Nitro in case of display, camera and processing speed but in case of battery backup, Canvas Nitro is better. As majority of goodness is present in Canvas Knight so it will be our winner here but if you love a Smartphone with good specifications as well as good battery you can go for Canvas Nitro too because it’s specifications are also good to some extent which can also give you the good Smartphone experience. However if you love every feature at its biggest outline, then Canvas Knight should be your choice.

by -
0 781

After releasing few successful models of their Eluga range of Smartphone’s like Power, DL1, Panasonic is now moving towards further expansion of this midrange Smartphone series by introducing their new Smartphone Panasonic Eluga U in the game and is expected to be dropped in the market in this month. Since the mid range Smartphone market is presently taken over by the brilliant Smartphone Xiaomi Mi 3, here we want to give the glimpse of post collision vision between these Smartphone’s however the collision is yet to occur. This will enable the world to choose better option for them without even getting a second though and without any confusion in mind.

panasonic eluga u vs xiaomi mi3
See Also – Download Panasonic Pc suite and USB drivers, all Android Devices
1. Display Quality Testing: Panasonic Eluga U is an elegantly designed Smartphone housing a 5.0inch LCD display with resolution of 720*1280pixels at pixel density of 294ppi along with Gorilla Glass 3 protection. On the other side, Xiaomi Mi3 flaunts a 5inch LCD display with resolution of 1080*1920 pixels and pixel density of 441ppi.  It also comes coated with corning Gorilla Glass 3. Clearly Xiaomi MI3 display quality has completely outshined the display of Panasonic Eluga U. No matter if the display size is same but quality matters which is present in Xiaomi Mi3.

2. Camera Distinction: Panasonic Eluga U comprises of a 13MP camera capturing pics at resolution of 4128*3096pixels featuring autofocus and LED flash and can shoot videos with 1080p @30fps quality. However Xiaomi Mi 3 also flaunts a 13 MP Autofocus camera with same resolution but with dual LED flash which is single in cases of Eluga U. Face and Smile detection and HDR are the additional camera features exclusively present in Xiaomi Mi3. Likewise 2MP front shooter is housed in Xiaomi Mi3. So far we can conclude that in this section, not too much distinction is seen but a dual LED flash is better in case of Xiaomi Mi3 but this factor is easy compromising.

3.  Performance Analysis: Panasonic Eluga U is pre installed with Android OS v4.4.2 Kit Kat and operates on 1.2 GHz Quad core Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor. Xiaomi Mi3 with Android v4.3 out of box is upgradable to Android v4.4.2 Kit Kat and operates on 2.3GHz Quad core Snapdragon 800 processor along with Adreno 330 GPU. This simply shows that Xiaomi Mi3 will be much faster at work as compared to Panasonic Eluga U. However both the processors are equipped with 2GB of RAM which is help the processor of Eluga U to work better and smooth and in case of Xiaomi Mi 3 it will just rock the Smartphone with speed and efficiency.

4. Storage Capacities: Panasoni Eluga U comes with 16GB of internal storage and is expandable up to 32GB via SD card. However Xiaomi Mi3 has got 2 variants with 16GB and 32GB storage capacity also expandable up to 32GB via SD card. Here also Xiaomi Mi 3 provides better choices but this aspect could have been compromising like dual LED flash in case of Xiaomi Mi3.

5.  Performance and Connectivity: Not much difference can be felt here because both being the 3G compatible Smartphone’s possess identical options fr connectivity which includes Bluetooth v4.0, GPS, Wi-Fi, etc. So no decisions for choosing the Smartphone can be made while looking at this section, hence minimising it.

6. Battery Back Up:  Panasoni Eluga U houses a 2500mAh battery but no info is yet available auto it’s talk time while as Xiaomi Mi3 packs 3050mAh battery with talk time of 25 h expectedly better than Eluga U.

After investigating all the spots of these Smartphone’s, Xiaomi Mi 3 is concluded to be the winner of this game with better speed and display quality along with little more advancement in other sections too. In comparison with Xiaomi Mi 3 this configuration of Panasonic Eluga U can’t with stand but for the other few Smartphone’s it can also prove a fair configuration.
See Also – Xiaomi MI3 PC Suite download and USB drivers download

by -
0 734

OnePlus is the brand new Chinese Smartphone manufacturing firm founded in Dec 17 2013. They have released their first flagship Killer Smartphone labelled OnePlus One in April 2014 with stunning features and impressive price tagging. So, here today we are about to do a close encounter between this OnePlus One and the record breaker loved one of India market Xiaomi Mi 3 which Is also a Chinese technology product. Both these Smartphone’s have dedicated a ground breaking entry to their manufacturers. Let’s dissect both these flagships and investigate which one is the best among these. This dissection will be very thorough and provided with trust worthy results from PhoneLance Inc. so that you can get the best one.

OnePlus One Vs Xiaomi MI3

1.  Display Distinction: The latest contender OnePlus One flaunts a full HD 5.5inches LTPS LCD display with resolution of 1080*1920pixels and impressive pixel density of 401ppi. This brilliant display is sheltered by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 and supports multi touch up to 10 fingers. On the other end Xiaomi Mi 3 houses a 5.0inches full HD LCD display with resolution of 1080*1920pixels and pixel density of 441ppi coated by Corning Gorilla Glass 3. This can be clearly seen that both displays are high quality in same proportion. The little low pixel density of OnePlus One is due to 0.5inch bigger display than Mi 3 other wise display quality is totally same. Here we can say that it is your choice that whether you want a high quality bigger display or a high quality medium sized display.

2. Performance: OnePlus one comes pre-installed with Android v4.4.2 Kit Kat where as Mi3 can also be upgraded from Android v4.3 Jellybean to latest v4.4.2 Kit Kat. OnePlus one operates on a Quad core Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor clocked at 2.5GHz alongside coupled with 3GB RAM. Xiaomi MI3 on the other hand operated on a Quad core Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor clocked at speed of 2.3GHz speed and coupled with 2GB RAM. However both the Smartphone’s are provided with Adreno 330 GPU for enhanced graphics support. The performance distinction clearly indicates that OnePlus One has got here processing capabilities as well as multi-tasking efficiency than Xiaomi Mi3 which is also a good Smartphone in comparison with a wide range of other Smartphone’s. In this essential class of dissection, One has taken lead.

3. Superior Moment Capturing: OnePlus One is provided with a 13MP auto focus primary camera along with dual LED flash capturing pictures with resolution of 4128*3096pixels. The additional features present are geo-tagging, touch focus, and face detection, panorama and HDR. It can capture videos of 2160p@30fps, 2160(DCI) @24p, 1080p@60fps and 720p@120fps. A 5MP front shooter is present for enjoying clear video calling and selfies and this shooter can also capture videos of 1080p@30fps. Taking a look at Xiaomi Mi3, it also houses a 13MP camera with same picture capturing quality as well as other features. It can capture videos of 1080p@30fps only. In this case a 2MP front shooter is present for video chatting and video capturing with quality of 1080p@30fps. Here the fight is a tie when it comes to the main camera but OnePlus with 5MP front shooter wins the fight with better front camera and better diversity in capturing videos.

4. Data Holding Capacity: OnePlus One as well as Xiaomi Mi 3 is available in two storage variants which include 16GB and 64GB. Xiaomi. Giving a good amount of storage to owners, both of these Smartphone are made devoid of SD card slot which hardly matters when you get a good storage capacity like this. In this aspect comes out to be same for both the Smartphone’s.

5. Network and connectivity: OnePlus One Smartphone is compatible with 2G, 3G and 4G LTE networks with frequencies as follows:

2G: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 /1900

3G: HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100

4G: LTE 700/ 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2300 / 2600

Xiaomi Mi3 supports 2G and 3G networks and is devoid of 4G compatibility. The range of frequencies for 2G and 3G are provided below:

2G: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900

3G: HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100

OnePlus One is the recommended choice in this case also because of its 4G compatibility as well as better 3G frequency support.

The rest of the connectivity features are almost identical to these Smartphone’s and also with the rest of high end Smartphone’s which include Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC and GPS. However Bluetooth makes a difference here as OnePlus has got Bluetooth v4.1 which is rarely found and the newly upgraded version however Xiaomi Mi3 possesses v4.0 which is found in majority of Smartphone’s at present. So expectedly Bluetooth speed of one will be better than Xiaomi Mi3.

6. Endurance period: OnePlus one houses a non removable Li-Po 3100mAh battery while as Xiaomi Mi3 is packed with 3050mAh Li-ion battery providing talk time of 25 hours. However the estimated battery backup of one is unknown yet but expected to be the best like its other features while the 3100mAh looks good at giving longer battery backup.

After dissecting both the Smartphone’s, we came to the conclusion that OnePlus One is indeed a much better especially faster Smartphone as compared to Xiaomi Mi3. One is our recommended winner but we can’t neglect the fact that Xiaomi Mi3 has also shown up high class features in its class and has defeated wide range of famed Smartphone’s so far. The fact behind the win of OnePlus win is that they have integrated implemented and introduced the stuff in their Smartphone beyond certain standards and enough to compete with Galaxy s5 and rest of the famed Smartphone’s.

by -
0 1038

Moto E is presently the most amazingly featured mid range Smartphone with attractive price tag. It was unveiled by Motorola in May 2014 and put forth for market in the same month. This gained a huge fame and fans from all over the world because of its exceptional features hardly possible to be provided at this range. This Smartphone was mimicked by various emerging manufacturers like Micromax because of its popularity. On the other hand Asus Zenfone4 is also a mid ranger from Asus with quite attractive price and specifications. It was unveiled to the world in January 2014 and stated rolling out in May 2014. The most essential factor which we have to concentrate here is that whether Zenfone4 has got the spark to prove itself better than Moto E or will Moto E still continue to be the undisputed best mid range Smartphone. Here you will clearly get the answer which will be most favourable to you. So, let’s step toward our analysis.

Motorola Moto E vs Asus Zenfone 4

1. Display Superiority:

Moto E flaunts a 4.3 inch capacitive display with resolution of 540*960 pixels and pixel density of 256ppi, while as Asus Zenfone4 comprises of a 4inch TFT display with resolution of 480*800 pixels and pixel density of 233ppi. Quite clearly Moto E has got a better display size as well as display quality. Smartphone experience will be much crispier and clearer in case of Moto E instead of Zenfon4 with just 49nch screen with low resolution.

2. Best Performer:

Moto E comes installed with Android Kit Kat 4.4.2 which is upgradable to Android v4.4.2. Zenfone4 comes preinstalled with Android v4.3 Jellybean which is also upgradable to the latest Android 4.4.2 Kit Kat. This implies that both the Smartphone’s have got equally up to date operating system at present. Moto E operates on Quad core 1.2GHz Snapdragon 200 processor and Adreno 302 for graphical assistance. Zenfone4 operates on dual core Intel atom processor also clocked at 1.2GHz. A powerVR GPU is provided for better graphical operations. Since the processing speeds of both the Smartphone’s is same however Moto E is expected to function little more efficiently with its work load distributed among four cores instead of just two cores. Due to same speed this effect will be only lightly noticeable or will remain recessive. Besides this, both these Smartphone’s have got 1GB of RAM for efficient multi tasking and better application support. This is very nice move from both developers.

3. Camera Clarity: 

Moto E as well as Zenfone4 houses a 5MP camera with almost identical features like face detection, panorama, etc. However Zenfone4 can capture 1080p videos @30 fps. And Moto E can capture 480p videos @30fps too. Not much diversity is seen their primary camera. In case of Moto E no secondary shooter is present unexpectedly however Zenfone4 has got a VGA secondary camera for video calling. This is a step ahead of Moto E by Zenfone4 and will be surely beneficial for them.

4. Network and Connectivity:

Just like every other mid range Smartphone, both these Smartphone’s are 3G enabled and include connectivity features which are Bluetooth, WI-FI, GPS. The connectivity is never a deciding factor because it’s identical for majority of Smartphone’s whether high end or mid range Smartphone. These are the basic requirements to be an Android phone and this is going on since the release of 1st Android.

5. Storage:

Moto E comprises of 4GB internal storage and it is expandable up to 32GB via SD card.4GB is the basic storage capacity flaunted by most of the mid range Smartphone’s. Zenfone4 has got 2 variants in which one has got 4GB storage while as other one houses 8GB internal storage and both the variants support SD card compatibility up to 64GB. You can choose one of the given variant according to your storage needs. Nothing special is seen here In case of Moto E but Zenfone4 has at least given you the choice to choose from two variants.

6. Running Period:

Moto E is packed with a 1980mAh battery giving 12h of talk time while as Zenfone4 has got 1200/1600mAh LI Po battery providing talk-time of 10h. In this aspect, both have got the close battery life but Moto E has indeed got the better battery backup as compared to Zenfone4. This is good for both but better for Moto E, Zenfone4 should have to increase its battery power knowing the need of battery when it comes to Android.

Looking at the different ads and cons of these two Smartphone’s, we can say that Moto E is better in case of display, battery and a little ahead in processor. However Zenfone4 can be considered as a choice because at least it has got a secondary camera and the rest of the features are also good. For the people who want better display as well as back up than Zenfon4, they should go for Moto E, but for the people who enjoy video calling, Zenfone4 is the preferred choice, you would have to compromise a little in case of display quality however 10h battery backup and processor is good. The applications multitasking governed by RAM of a Smartphone are identical in both the cases so switching different applications will be smoother equally in both Smartphone’s. Also both of these are up to date with the current version of Android which is exceptional for a Smartphone of this price to be getting regularly updated from the source.  Moto E will be our recommended choice because of its better features as compared to Zenfone4 but the only pinching thing from it is being devoid of front camera. This can give better opportunity to Zenfone4 to be explored by the world.