UA-53087017-1
Tags Posts tagged with "comparision"

comparision

by -
0 888

It is pretty obvious that Samsung made huge profits this year not because of their premium Smartphone line up but because of Samsung Galaxy J Series Smartphones most notably Galaxy J7 which led Samsung to drop another nuke in the Smartphone arena by the name of Galaxy J7 (2016) which was just a superficial upgrade to Galaxy j7. Samsung has gone beyond the hood this time and dropped a fire dripping bomb shell in the midrange arena as an upgrade to J series i.e. Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime.

Samsung Galaxy J7Galaxy J7 2016 vs Galaxy j7 Prime 2016

Galaxy J7 prime flaunts all the assets pretty enough to make you crave for it. Starting with the frontal section, you will be getting a full HD display with resolution of 1080*1920 and pixel density of 401ppi. Its not as good as Galaxy A5 but its tremendously achieved upgrade of Galaxy J7 Smartphone which has 720p display. Galaxy J7 prime has been tested for its display and the performance is awesome so far. Addition of Gorilla Glass 4 protection to Galaxy J7 Prime is also worth admiration.
Although both the Smartphones are packed with 13MP rear camera and front flash but Galaxy J7 Prime has upper hand when it comes to front camera because it houses an 8MP front sensor as compared to 5MP’s of Galaxy J7.

samsung-galaxy-j7-prime
Samsung Galaxy J7 is a giant when it comes to storage and processing capabilities since it comes with onboard storage of 32GB along with 3GB RAM. It is powered by an octa core Exynos 7580 processor. While as Galaxy J7 regular variant has just 16GB of internal storage with 1.5GB RAM. It clearly suggests that Galaxy J7 Prime is a slayer of regular Galaxy J7.
An eyeball catching feature that is seen in Galaxy J7 prime is the presence of Fingerprint sensor on its home button and Galaxy J7 lacks this feature which is a big turn off for tech giants. Likewise when we talk about the battery endurance, Galaxy J7 packs 3000mAh battery while as Galaxy J7 has shown improvement with its 3300mAh battery.
What makes us take the side of Galaxy J7 Prime is the pricing factor which Samsung has set for it. All the features present in this Smartphone are from premium shelf but nicely introduced in this midrange tearing Smartphone. Galaxy J7 Prime is undoubtedly the best buy Smartphone for the year 2016 however Galaxy J7 regular version is also the best you get the price tag that Samsung is offering. Overall it can be concluded that Samsung has given a hard blow to Midrange Smartphone sector by introducing a premium featured

Smartphone at the midrange price. Infact it was a much needed move for Samsung in order to get their spark back in the midrange Smartphone market which is the main concern of Chinese Smartphone market domination strategy.

by -
0 632

The Chinese Smartphone manufacturer Xiaomi stumbled into a record making sales count in last year with its high configuration Smartphone’s being made available at an unexpectedly lower price points. Xiaomi completely took over most of the mid range market with its high class products and nowadays Xiaomi is eying toward covering up the premium Smartphone market by making Smartphone’s with amazing features available user friendly rate. Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is the latest Smartphone from Xiaomi under their Mi Note tagline expected to be soon released in January 2015.
This Smartphone with its amazing configuration has made it an easy charge to get involved in a head on head comparison with this around 40k priced LG G Flex 2 Smartphone. This LG G Flex 2 is the 2nd variant of the LG’s curved tech Smartphone’s introduced after some tweaks and upgrades. So, let’s explore as well as compare these Smartphone’s on overall basis.

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs LG G Flex 2

Xiaomi Mi Note Pro vs. LG G Flex 2: Comparison of two classes

1. Design and Display: Talking about Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, it houses a 5.7inches IPS LCD display with pixel resolution of 1440*2560pixels and pixel density of 515ppi, sheltered by Corning Gorilla Glass 3. Besides this premium configured display, the back panel of this Smartphone is also sheltered by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 technology making this Smartphone anti scratch, anti stain and anti fingerprint from all sides besides furnishing extra smoothness in touch.
LG G Flex 2 flaunts a 5.5inches curved P-OLED display with resolution of 1080*1920pixels and density of 403ppi also sheltered by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 and like its former variant, the back panel is coated by self healing material. Also a great experimentation has been done to make it much more durable and standing against bend and drops. However in the present case scenario, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has a better display as per its high pixel density, a bit bigger size as well as IPS technology. However fans of curves have the option of LG G Flex 2 whose display is average just like most of the premium devices in the market.

2. Performance: Xiaomi Mi Note Pro ships with Android v5.0.1 Lollipop OS operating on Snapdragon 810 chipset clocked at 1.5GHz accompanied by 4GB RAM and Adreno 430 processor. Surprising but true, LG G Flex 2 also ships with same version of Android OS along with chipset of same speed and GPU. However the difference lies in the fact that Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has got 4GB Ram where as LG G Flex 2 ships with 2GB RAM and 3GB RAM variant. In this case also Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is showing the peak in the graph with an extra gigabyte of RAM enveloped for smoothest and broadest compatibility performance.

3. Camera: Briefing the scenario, both Smartphone are present with 13MP rare camera along with dual LED Flash and all the other important aspects being identical. However Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has got a 4MP front shooter unlike LG G Flex 2 housing 2.1MP front camera. It’s evident from the observations that Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has been machined taking care of selfie revolution as well as increasing video calling network. Thus, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is a better configuration Smartphone so far with great camera combo.

3. Storage: Being devoid of SD card compatibility, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has been provided with whooping 64GB internal storage. In case of LG G Flex 2, two different variants will be flaunting 16GB and 32GB internal storage with SD card storage expandable up to 128GB. Despite without SD card compatibility, Xiaomi Mi Note Pro has got nothing to regret for because its internal storage is bigger and better without any need of expandability. In this case LG G Flex 2 is also in the game with expandable option present but less internal storage on the board.

4. Network and Connectivity: Both the Smartphone’s are compatible with GSM / HSDPA / LTE networks along with the identical connectivity modes which include, Wi Fi, Bluetooth and GPS. However NFC is present in Xiaomi Mi Note Pro and to be confirmed soon in case of LG G Flex 2. Also LG G Flex 2 has got a bit higher version of Bluetooth v4.1 unlike Xiaomi Mi Note Pro with Bluetooth v4.0 but this doesn’t effect on overall configuration map.

5. Battery Endurance: Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is packed with non removable 3090mAh Li-Po battery and LG G Flex 2 also has got non removable Li-Po 3000mAh battery however the backup of these Smartphone’s is yet to be confirmed. But the values suggest that battery backup will be up to the mark in both the cases being provided with good battery power

After grinding out both these Smartphone’s, it’s clearly visible that Xiaomi Mi Note Pro is much bitterly configured in case of display, performance as well as camera which count as main aspects for being a perfect Smartphone. Our curvy contender also has got premium configuration though not as good as Xiaomi Mi Note Pro but can also give a great experience since display as well as performance is good also curves being the sources of attraction. However, our senses vote for Xiaomi Mi Note Pro with every feature put forth at the maximum elastic limit.

by -
0 1183

After the dominant and successful contribution to the midrange Smartphone market by the Chinese manufacturer Xiaomi last year, they have all over again attained a great sales count for their Xiaomi Mi Note boasting an energetic configuration. The success has given rise to the rival Chinese Smartphone manufacture Meizu to eye over the Asian market especially India, which is already flooded by Xiaomi. However Xiaomi has got the competition straight with the release Meizu M1 Note by the opponent also boasting some awesome stuff. So, let’s dissect these Smartphone’s in detail and check out which one is the best out of the two. It’s definitely going to be an interesting face off between these two Smartphone’s, both aimed at providing premium specifications and ordinary pricing. Let’s get them into the action.

Meizu M1 Note vs Xiaomi Mi Note

1. Design and Display: In case of design, Meizu M1 Note is a direct mimic of iPhone 5c more evidently visible because of the circular button at the lower base and a typical iPhone candy bar design. However durability is good because of its uni body design and ceramic grip of the back panel. It flaunts a 5.5inches IGZO display providing resolution of 1080*1920pixels and pixel density of 403ppi. However Xiaomi Mi Note is build of corning Gorilla Glass 3 back panel known for its durability. It flaunts a 5.7inches IPS LCD display with resolution of 1080 pixels and pixel density of 386ppi. The figures clearly indicate that Xiaomi Mi Note is a bit bigger however Meizu M1 Note features few more pixels. Overall it remains a tie here and both the options are option for a buyer because there’s a quite good balance between these Smartphone’s.

2. Performance: Meizu M1 Note ships with Android v4.4.4 Kit Kat pre-installed operating on an octa core Mediatek processor clocked at 1.7GHz accompanied by 2GB RAM and Mali-T760 GPU. Xiaomi Mi Note on the other hand comes with Android v4.4.4 Kit Kat OS operating on a Quad core Snapdragon 801 processor clocked at 2.5GHz coupled with 3GB RAM and Adreno 330 GPU. Both the opponents run on same operating system but Xiaomi Mi Note is clocked at higher speed as compared to Meizu M1 Note and also has got an extra gigabyte of RAM. Although being octa core can make Meizu M1 work well, but the efficiency and application running endurance will still be elevated in Xiaomi Mi Note.

See Also – Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Vs Xiaomi Mi Note Pro best phablet comparison

3. Camera clarity: Both the Smartphone’s are provided with same 13MP rear camera along with dual LED flash but Meizu M1 Note features 5MP front shooter unlike Xiaomi Mi Note which has got 4MP front shooter. Here Meizu has gone steps beyond Xiaomi in selfie revolution by providing an extra megapixel in Meizu M1 Note. However it may not make a big difference to the majority of the audience because difference is negligible.

4. Storage: Meizu M1 Note is seen in two variants with 16GB and 32GB internal storage capacities. Unlike Meizu M1 Note, Xiaomi Mi Note is provided with 16B and 64GB internal storage variants. 16GB variants being identical but the capacity is much vast in higher variant of Xiaomi Mi Note. This is a good step by Xiaomi because SD card compatibility option is not available neither in Xiaomi Mi Note or in Meizu M1 Note.

5. Battery Endurance: This is also one of the most essential factor in Phablet styled Smartphone’s because the drainage is high due to bigger display along with premium processing, so providing these Smartphone’s with better battery backup is must. Meizu M1 Note has been packed with a 3140mAh battery while as Xiaomi Mi Note houses a 3000mAh battery. Overall both the Smartphone’s will provide a good battery backup with an expectation of a bit extra talk time in Meizu M1 Note.

See Also – Xiaomi Mi Note Pro specifications

This epic battle has left us to the conclusion that both Smartphone’s are packed with awesome configuration. Xiaomi Mi Note while exceeding in performance is taken down by the extra megapixel and battery provided in Meizu M1 Note. So, we can say that in case Xiaomi Mi Note 64 GB variant is a tough gaming boss with a gigantic storage provided with performance. However Meizu Mi Note is also good for day to day gaming experience but might not overpower Xiaomi Mi Note in this section. Thus, Xiaomi Mi Note is recommended for gaming and heavy data storage. However both the Smartphone’s are exceptionally good as far as needs of a common person is concerned which involve playing of few famous games, music and web surfing However you should consider Meizu M1 Note if you are a hardcore selfie lover but the camera difference is too minute take seriously and ignore the power of Snapdragon.

by -
0 650

Enjoy the tug of war between two Chinese Tech giants Lenovo and HTC dominating with their wide range of products all over the world. Let’s see what they have to show off against each other and who has got the much dominance in Smartphone developing skill. This is going to be the fair war because both the Smartphone’s are the best of both the companies which means both of them are high end Smartphone’s. Lenovo Vibe Z was announced in late November 2013 while as HTC Desire 816 was launched in February 2014. It’s quite interesting to note that there’s just two months of difference between the birth dates of these two rivals. Let’s take their every aspect one by one in our rear view where nothing hides.

Lenovo Vibe Z vs HTC Desire 816

1. Operating System:

The match gets drawn here because HTC Desire 816 as well as Lenovo Vibe Z runs on the latest Android Kit Kat 4.4.2. The only difference here is that HTC Desire 816 comes with Kit Kat 4.4.2 while as Lenovo Vibe Z needs to be upgraded manually to 4.4.2 Kit Kat. Lenovo Vibe Z has got Android 4.3 Jellybean out of box. However this doesn’t make any difference in case of high end Smartphone’s.

2. Processing and Performance:

Lenovo Vibe Z is powered by Quad core Snapdragon 800 clocked at a speed of 2.2 GHz along with 2GB of RAM for effective multitasking. HTC Desire 816 on the other hand operates on Quad core Snapdragon 400 clocked at a speed of 1.6 GHz along with 1.5GB RAM. Here Lenovo Vibe Z looks dominating over HTC desire 816 with its higher operating speed and a good amount of RAM. HTC Desire 816 isn’t bad in performance with this internal architecture but just little lesser than Lenovo Vibe Z. However it can also perform well.

3. Display:

Lenovo Vibe Z sports a 5.5 inch LCD display with screen resolution of 1080*1920 pixels at pixel density of 401ppi along with Gorilla Glass 3 protection which is worth admiring. HTC Desire 816 on the other hand also houses a 5.5 inch display but lesser screen resolution 720*1280 pixels and pixel density of 267ppi. This kind of display configuration is very little as compared to Lenovo Vibe Z. Lenovo Vibe Z has got that winning charm in this aspect.

4. Camera and Video:

Both Lenovo Vibe Z and HTC Desire 816 flaunts a 13 MP primary camera with auto-focus and LED flash. There’s only a slight difference in camera resolution but too slight to create an expectation. However there are few extra additional camera features seen in case of HTC Desire 816 which include geo tagging, touch focus, face detection, HD AV recording and HDR while as Lenovo Vibe Z only has basic camera features including Geo-tagging, touch focus and face detection. Here we can say that HTC Desire 816 is little better than camera feature point of view but the same 13MP for both the Smartphone’s doesn’t give too much credit to HTC. HTC has just done good in maximizing the 13MP camera features at the fullest. Moreover both the Smartphone’s have got 1080p video shooting ability. There’s also a tie between their front shooters because both having 5MP@1080p that’s the best of both.

5. Storage:

Lenovo Vibe Z is again turning over HTC Desire 816 because Lenovo Vibe Z has got internal storage capacity of 16GB where as HTC desire 816 has got only 8GB internal memory. However HTC desire 816 supports SD card slot expandable up to 128 GB where as there’s no card slot in Lenovo Vibe Z. A person hardly needs more than 18GB internal storage for his Smartphone so Lenovo being devoid of SD card slot doesn’t make it lame.

6. Network and Connectivity:

No competition arises here because both are 2G, 3G and 4G enabled Smartphone’s and connectivity options of both Smartphone’s include Bluetooth4.0 and WIFI .

7. Life and Death:

Wondering what?

This is just about their battery backups.

Lenovo Vibe Z houses non-removable Li-Po 3000mAh battery giving talk time of 33 hours and standby time of 648hours.

HTC Desire 816 has also got a non- removable Li-Po battery but only 2600mAh providing good talk time.

This is obviously pretty clear now that Lenovo Vibe Z should be your ultimate choice if you are hung up between two Smartphone. It has got battery, processor, better, battery and better storage than HTC Desire 816 so this is our winner. But HTC Desire 816 is also good at its level.

by -
0 1020

To our surprise the CEO of Blackberry John Chen has announced the official launch of Blackberry z3.This is the core contender of blackberry to take on other rival high end Smartphone’s like Samsung Galaxy s5. Whether Blackberry Z3 is going to make it or not, let’s check it here. We will thoroughly provide you with the highs and lows both the Smartphone have and let you know which one is the best for you.

Samsung Galaxy S5 vs Blackberry Z3

Display:

Samsung Galaxy s5 is bricked with 5.1 inch super AMOLED display with screen resolution 1080*1920 pixels along with pixel density of 432ppi. IP67 certification and Gorilla Glass 3 are the addition two assets for this powerful Smartphone.

Blackberry Z3 on the other hand possesses 5inch capacitive display with screen resolution of just 540*960 pixels and pixel density of 220ppi.

With no doubt Samsung Galaxy s5 is leading in this aspect also with 1 inch bigger display and a huge resolution difference and it clearly confirms that Samsung Galaxy s5 will have better visual capability.

Operating System and Processor:

Samsung Galaxy s5 runs on latest version of Android kit Kat 4.4.2 and clocked at a lightning fast speed of 2.5 GHz with its Quad core Snapdragon 801 processor and graphic supporting unit Adreno 330.

Blackberry Z3 runs on 10.2.1 along with speed of 1.2 GHz embedded with dual core Snapdragon processor 400 and Adreno 305.

There is a very huge difference in their version of processors. The processing speed of Galaxy s5 is almost twice as that of blackberry z3. Also the processor and GPu of blackberry z3 is much older version of Snapdragon and Adreno.

Network:

Samsung Galaxy s5 supports 2G, 3G and 4G networking facilities.

Blackberry Z3 supports 2G and 3G only. 4G is missing in Blackberry Z3 which can be a serious pitfall.

Storage:

Samsung Galaxy s5 contains 16/32 GB internal memory which means there are two variants of Galaxy s5 available to you according to your storage needs. It also includes 2GB RAM.

Blackberry Z3 comes with inbuilt 8GB internal memory and 1.5 GB RAM.

Camera:

Samsung Galaxy s5 sports 16MP camera with resolution of 5312*2988 pixels with some additional features like face detection, autofocus, LED flash, image stabilization, dual shot and many more exciting features. Also a 2MP front camera @1080p with dual video call feature is present.

While as Blackberry Z3 sports a 5MP camera with 2592*1944 pixel resolution and limited few features which include geo tagging, autofocus and LED flash. A1.1 MP front camera @720p is available for video calling.

Battery:

Samsung Galaxy s5 is backed with Li-ion 2800mAh battery providing talk time of 21hours on 2G and 67 hours on continuous music play.

Blackberry Z3 contains a non- removable Li-ion 2500mAh battery providing talk time of up to 15hours and 30 minutes on 2G while as 384 hours on standby.

Taking look at all the features of both the Smartphone’s above its clear that Samsung Galaxy s5 is the best Smartphone as compared to blackberry z3 because every feature of Z3 is limited while as Galaxy s5 has got maximum possible features of Smartphone.

by -
0 854

Micromax is an experienced Smartphone brand among all of these. Their Canvas series of android Smartphone’s flourished all over the world since past few years and is still at the peak of its advancement. Canvas series has shown some Smartphone’s which even competed against the Samsung galaxy series. Karbonn wasn’t even in a frame before they released their Titanium series and it has proved reasonably profitable and dominant for them but is still lagging behind Canvas series. Lenovo is also coming out with some gleaming stuff to show off to the world.

Lenovo didn’t need to build their market for their android Smartphone’s because they are already well-known laptop manufacturers and have been trusted by customers since ages. The new comer Gionee is also buzzing around internet within no time. We will compare all these Smartphone’s from the brands described above to show who is in the lead among these and who is lagging behind. It will make you clear to choose a Smartphone from the given models after you will thoroughly read our comparison. It is going to be much more informative than any other comparison makers because we will guide you and give you step by step suggestions. Most of all our comparison will be most detailed with every minor thing taking in consideration. Starting from os to the battery strength everything is going to be clear.

Micromax A114R Canvas Beat vs KarbonnTitanium S5 plus vs Lenovo S660 vs Gionee Elife E5

Operating System of these Smartphone’s:

1) Micromax A114R Canvas Beat : Android OS 4.2.2 (jellybean)

2) Karbonn Titanium S5 : Android OS 4.1 (jellybean)

3) Lenovo S660 : Android OS 4.2 (jellybean)

4) Gionee Elife E5 : Android OS 4.2 (jellybean)

They are all working on the same jellybean platform with slight difference of versions but it doesn’t make anything clear. Micromax A114R Canvas Beat has got the latest version of jellybean installed but Lenovo S660 and Gionee Elife E5 has also got better version of Android OS 4.2 (jellybean) which is not rather bad. Karbonn Titanium S5 is lagging here with the most basic version of jellybean installed. It will create a difference but we can’t judge any one of these due to small variations of versions, basically all are jellybean.

Processing Capability:

Micromax A114R Canvas Beat has got Broadcom BCM23550 Quad core 1.2 GHZ cortex A7 processor along with Broadcom Videocore IV GPU.

Karbonn Titanium S5 is powered with Qualcomm MSM8225Q snapdragon 1.2 GHZ Quad core processor provided with assistance of Adreno 302 GPU.

Lenovo S660 houses a Mediatek MT6582M Quad core 1.3 GHZ process and Mali-400MP2 GPU for added enhancement.

Gionee Elife E5 is also standing side by side in a tug of war. It also features 1.5GHZ Quadcore Cortex A7 processor along with PowerVR series 5XT GPU.

It’s so amazing to watch that every Smartphone enlisted here has got quadcore processor for efficient multitasking and application management. Obviously Gionee Elife E5 is much most fast than others mentioned and after that Lenovo S660 has got slightly better processing speed than rest. Micromax A114R Canvas Beat and Karbonn Titanium S5 has also got nice speed of 1.2 GHZ and quad core processors make it even more faster. Among all of these Smartphone’s Gionee Elife E5 is the best in processing speed as discussed already.

Display superiority:

Micromax A114R Canvas Beat and Karbonn Titanium S5 both feature a 5.0 inch IPS LCD capacitive display with pixel density of ~220ppi. Lenovo S660 has got 4.7 inch IPS LCD capacitive screen with pixel density of~234ppi and Gionee Elife E5 features 4.8 inch super AMOLED capacitive display with pixel density of~306ppi. Its touch screen is protected

Page Breakwith Corning Gorilla Glass 2.Vowwe.This new comer Gionee is looking in great innovative passion. An AMOLED display plus Gorilla Glass 2.What can be better than that in this class? Canvas Beat and titanium S5 has got only 0.2inch bigger display than Gionee Elife E5 but it overcome that with AMOLED technology and Gorilla Glass 2.Lenovo has also got fair 4.7 inch display and there’s nothing bad in that but we are searching the best to suit us and Gionee Elife E5 has got that up to here. Let’s move forward.

Camera spotlessness:

All these Smartphone’s have got an 8MP camera with autofocus and LED flash. Micromax A114R Canvas Beat is the one making difference here with its dual LED flash instead of single but it doesn’t make any big difference here neither does it effect on any other quality of Smartphone. Micromax A114R Canvas Beat, Lenovo S660 and Gionee Elife E5 have got exactly same additional camera features which include geo tagging, touch focus and face detection. Karbonn Titanium S5 is lagging in the additional features because it has got only geo tagging option available. Now let’s see if front camera can make a huge difference between these Smartphone’s.

Micromax A114R Canvas Beat and Karbonn Titanium S5 have got 2MP secondary camera, Lenovo S660 features a VGA camera while as Gionee Elife E5 houses a 5MP front camera. Front camera has again proved Gionee Elife E5 the best. While Micromax A114R Canvas Beat and Karbonn Titanium performed average with 2MP only which is quite fair but is very disappointing from Lenovo S660 side.

Speedy Performer:

Whenever we talk about the performance of the phone .The first thing that comes in our minds is it’s RAM. Here also we will discuss the performance of these Smartphone’s based on their RAM.

Micromax A114R Canvas Beat, Lenovo S660, Karbonn Titanium S5 and Gionee Elife E5 have stuck on the same line. All these Smartphone’s feature a 1GB RAM that’s fairly enough for Smartphone under this range. All these brands have concentrated well about their Smartphone performance and reached the same conclusion of providing 1GB RAM to their Smartphone. On the basis of RAM all these are good performers but as discussed earlier Gionee Elife E5 have made a mark of being best with its exceptional 1.5 GHZ processing speed.

Storing capacity-Internal Memory:

Micromax A114R Canvas Beat has got 4GB internal memory out of which only 1.5 GB is available to the user and that’s very low for such a good Smartphone .It could have been provided with better storage. Karbonn Titanium S5 has also got only 4GB internal memory but it’s much better than Canvas Beat because all the 4GB are available to user. Lenovo S660 has got 8 GB internal memory which is very nice. Gionee Elife E5 is again making a difference here with 16GB internal memory that is much more than all of this .But mystery behind this exceptional internal memory is that Gionee Elife E5 lacks card slot and you cannot increase its storage anymore that’s why they have already provided 16GB so that users will not fall short of memory.

Network and Connectivity:

All the enlisted Smartphone’s are 2G and 3G enabled dual sim Smartphone’s except Gionee Elife E5 which has got only single sim. All these Smartphone’s support different 2G and 3G frequencies as listed below:

Micromax A114R Canvas Beat 2G; GSM 900 / 1800

3G; HSDPA 2100

Karbonn Titanium S5 2G; GSM 900 / 1800

3G; HSDPA 2100

Lenovo S66 2G-GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 and GSM 850 / 1800 / 1900

3G-HSDPA 900 / 2100 and HSDPA 1800 / 1900

Gionee Elife E5: 2G; GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900

3G; HSPA 900 / 2100

The single sim of Gionee Elife E5 supports maximum 2G and 3G frequencies. It’s a brilliant effort.

Bluetooth: All these Smartphone’s have got Bluetooth version 4.0 except Karbonn Titanium s5 which has got Bluetooth version 2.0 which is too old now but still works good.

WLAN: All the enlisted Smartphone’s are wifi enabled providing the same quality but slight difference in their speeds which won’t cause much problem. More exactly its Karbonn Titanium s5 which is lacking a good amount of wifi speed and the rest are good in their speeds.

Who lasts long?

It’s very significant feature of android Smartphone to have good battery backup otherwise it makes you stick to the charger because of instant battery drainage. Therefore, this factor also needs to be examined thoroughly. Let’s take a look.

Micromax A114R Canvas Beat : 1900mAh battery

Karbonn Titanium S5 : 2000mAh battery

Lenovo S660 : 3000mAh battery

Gionee Elife E5 : 2000mAh

It’s very clear now if you want the best battery life you will have to sacrifice other high end features and compromise on the average rated specifications of Lenovo S660.But 2000mAh is quite nice batter so you can go for Gionee Elife E5 with brilliant specifications and a good battery back. Micromax A114R Canvas Beat with only 1900mAh battery lags behind all of these and after this Karbonn Titanium S5 has a good battery but it suffered in some qualities above. It’s the exact truth that Gionee Elife E5 topped in all features so it’s the most recommended product while Lenovo S660 overcome by its exceptional battery life. The rest of the two were average products with average specifications.

by -
0 459

Micromax and Xolo are the best companies who provide best smartphone range in low price. If you wish to have stylish and trendy phones and do not want to shell out handsome money for smartphones then better check with this two companies phone. Micromax and Xolo provide good smartphone with latest hardware technology in affordable price. Recently both the companies have released their latest smartphones in the market which is stuffed with good and latest technology with good looks and design.

Micromax Canvas Beat A114R and Xolo Q1100 are the flagships of these companies and we will discuss all the features and specs associated with this handset. We will figure out which phone will prove the best phone in terms of every aspect of the smartphone.

Design:

Body of both the phones are made of plastic but has good build quality material which offer superior hold on to the body of the phone. Xolo and Micromax both’s flagship comes in dual-SIM feature and they support 2G and 3G networks. If you are moving to the place where LTE network is available then this phone will be no use. Front of the both the phone has display and three capacitive buttons below display, back of the phone has camera and flash. Looks and feel of both Xolo and Micromax’s phone is good as per the price is tagged on this phone.

micromax a114r

Display:

All companies try to make efficient and clear display so that even the price of the phone is not high and users get full satisfaction of bright and vivid color display. Micromax Canvas Beat has 5-inch display with technology used is IPS LCD which is capable of producing 16M colors. Display of Canvas Beat has 540 x 960 pixels resolution packed with 220ppi density. Lower the pixel density poorer the display turns and Canvas Beat does not have impressive ppi which means display of the phone is just average with low sunlight legibility and average viewing angle.

Xolo Q1100 comes with 5.0 inches screen and this phone is also stuffed with IPS LCD touchscreen which produces good color reproduction as the screen has properties of supporting 16M colors. 5 inches display of Xolo is packed with 1280×720 pixels and 294ppi pixel density. Resolution and ppi of Xolo is more than Micromax and screen of Q1100 produces good viewing angle and average display features.

Hardware:

If you want to rate the phone, then we look for the performance of the phone. Performance is outcome of powerful hardware configuration which processes all the work with ease. Micromax Canva beat has processor of Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7, 1GB RAM and Broadcom VideoCore IV on Broadcom BCM23550 chipset.

Xolo has given some serious configuration on its flagship. Xolo has tried Snapdragon 400 chipset for its flagship for the first time. On Qualcomm MSM8228 Snapdragon 400 chipset you will have processor of Quad-core 1.4 GHz, GPU of Adreno 305 and RAM of 1GB making the phone to perform well under serious situation like multiple apps handling and playing HD game this phone will not let you down.

If we compare the hardware of both the phones then Xolo is providing the best hardware for smartphones whereas Micromax has used Broadcom chipset which is not impressive against Xolo’s Snapdragon chipset. Xolo Q1100 is given with ample of space too, internal memory of 8GB and further is expandable. Micromax has given with 4GB internal storage and further is expandable.

xolo q1100

Camera:

Both the smartphone has 8MP camera which captures images at 3264 x 2448 pixels. Both the phones have LED flash but Micromax canvas beat has dual LED flash. Camera feature of both the phones are almost same like Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection on Micromax Canvas Beat and Xolo has HDR and panorama which is extra feature compare to Micromax’s device. Video shot from 8MP of Xolo then you will get full HD resolution and whereas Micromax Canvas beat will have 720p recording resolution. Both the phone has front camera of 2MP which takes care of all video chatting session.

Software and battery:

Xolo Q1100 is running on Android 4.3 Jelly Bean and on other hand as Canvas Beat is running on Android 4.2 Jelly Bean. UI of both the phone is really impressive as it advances the touch and feel of the phone. Battery is an important hardware as it helps the phone to get power to run all day long. When we talk about battery then Xolo Q1100 has 1,900 mAh battery and other Canvas Beat is running on Android 4.2 Jelly Bean which could have much advanced like Xolo phone and has battery backup of 2,000 mAh which is very poor for long hour users.

Battery of the phone should have decent battery life else it will be a great issue to operate phone at longer time. Both the smartphone scores zero mark for battery life of the phone. Average users will do well with this battery configuration but for heavy users it will not be helpful.

Conclusion:

Phone is said to be placed in mid-range phone but there are some hardware which is disappointing. Display of both the phones are 5-inch display but resolution and pixel per inch density is very low in Micromax’ new device. Both phones are dual-SIM capable and also have good camera which captures brilliant snaps in outdoor lightning. Only problem with Micromax is very low which serves talk time of just 5 hours and Android OS version of the phone is also outdated. Rest all the features and specs of both the phones are perfect.

If you want to make a choice between these two phones then better go for Xolo Q1100 as it has many features much advanced than Micromax Canvas Beat.